100% Tobacco-Free Schools protect children from the harmful effects of tobacco
at school. The benefits of a smoke-free environment and positive role models
for students are important, but there are many other reasons that a 100% TFS
policy benefits the entire school community.
Click here to read Frequently Asked Questions
About 100% Tobacco-Free Schools, and keep reading below for 10 great reasons to
go tobacco free:
10 Reasons Your School District should be 100% Tobacco-Free
- 100% TFS provide positive role modeling
by adult employees and visitors
- Lessons learned in the classroom are reinforced
with the 100% TFS policy
- 100% TFS districts provide a safe environment
for students by reducing exposure to secondhand tobacco
smoke
- 100% TFS policies protect children from
developing an addiction to a dangerous drug.
- 100% TFS policies comply with Federal Legislation
prohibiting smoking inside school buildings.
- 100% TFS policies work in conjunction with
state and federal laws.
- The 100% TFS model policy helps ensure compliance
with state laws designed to limit access to tobacco by children.
- 100% TFS policies prepare students for the
reality of tobacco-free workplaces and communities.
- 100% TFS polices protect schools from the
risk of future liability by prohibiting smoking on school
premises.
- TFS reduces the risk of fires due to "smoking
materials."
Support for Reason #1:
A 100% TFS policy represents a firm commitment by school administration,
teachers and parents to prohibit tobacco use by students, employees and
visitors. Compliance with the 100% TFS policy confirms this commitment and
provides genuine opportunities for adults and peers to serve as role models for
not using tobacco. A 2003 study found that students were more likely to
smoke in a location where they saw other students and adults smoking. In
addition, youth look to adults they respect, such as teachers and school staff,
as role models. For these reasons, it is important that all school staff serve
as positive role models for students and do not use any tobacco products in
their presence.
Support for Reason #2:
Educators consider tobacco use prevention education to be
an essential element of comprehensive school health programs.
Curriculums often teach resistance skills to help children
learn to say no to offers of alcohol, tobacco and other drugs.
Coaches of athletic teams regularly prohibit tobacco use by
team members. School hallways and bulletin boards often display
prevention messages. Children get a mixed message if they
step outside their classrooms to view clusters of students
and/or teachers using tobacco on school grounds. Schools that
are not tobacco-free send conflicting messages to students
about tobacco use.
Support for Reason #3:
Children are especially sensitive to the effects of secondhand smoke, whether
the smoke is indoors or outdoors and even limited exposure can be harmful.
Passing by an outdoor smoking area can trigger an asthma attack or worsen
breathing problems for students with certain health conditions. As little as 30
minutes of exposure to secondhand smoke can affect coronary arteries of
healthy, young nonsmokers. It causes acute and chronic respiratory disease, ear
and upper respiratory infections - all primary causes of school absences. These
dangers do not meet the standard of a safe environment at school.
Support for Reason #4:
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has classified nicotine, found in tobacco
products, as a drug. School policies do not allow the use of other drugs, such
as alcohol, marijuana, or cocaine on school grounds and at school-sponsored
events. Why should an exception be made for nicotine and tobacco?
Support for Reason #5:
The Pro Children Act of 1994 states: "No person shall permit smoking within any
indoor facility utilized for services to kindergarten, elementary, or secondary
education or library services to children." Children's services for routine
health care or day care or early childhood development are also included. This
applies to all schools and programs that are funded by the Federal Government
or through State and local Governments
Support for Reason #6:
Federal law requires that, if they are to remain eligible for federal funding,
school districts must ban smoking in their 'indoor facilities.' However, the
law specifically allows states to have more restrictive laws. Thus, a school
district's complete ban on smoking should not jeopardize its federal funding.
North Carolina law prevents units of state or local government from banning
smoking in most public places, including their own buildings. However, the law
does not apply to a 'primary or secondary school...except for a teacher's
lounge.' Therefore, since federal law will not allow indoor smoking without
violating North Carolina law, smoking may be banned at school. In August of
2003, the North Carolina General Assembly amended its legal requirements
regarding the use of tobacco products on school grounds and at school-sponsored
events. The new Tobacco-free Schools Law (G.S. 143-601) points out clearly that
no other law on tobacco use, such as G.S. 143-595 through G.S. 143-601 (Smoking
in Public Places) can prevent a local board of education from adopting and
enforcing a more restrictive policy on the use of tobacco in school buildings
and school facilities, on school campuses, at school-related or
school-sponsored events, and in or on other school property.
Support for Reason #7:
In 1997 North Carolina Legislature amended the existing state law prohibiting
the sale and distribution of tobacco products to people under age 18. Schools
can uphold the intent of the law to limit youth access to tobacco products by
crafting policies that prohibit tobacco use by students, employees and visitors
at all times, in all school buildings, on all school grounds, and at all
school-sponsored events. Additionally, schools can consistently enforce
tobacco-use policies and can confiscate tobacco products and paraphernalia
brought to school.
Support for Reason #8:
100% TFS policies
prepare students for an ever-increasingly tobacco-free world,
where tobacco is prohibited in worksites, restaurants, airplanes,
malls and more. Employers are becoming more reluctant to hire
smokers, due to increased absenteeism, health care costs and
possible disability. In a competitive job market and nonsmoking
community environment, it is important that all students leave
their school years without a smoking-related handicap.
Support for Reason #9:
Litigation related to tobacco addiction and exposure to environmental tobacco
smoke is growing. Individuals have recovered damages in lawsuits because their
employers failed to provide a safe, smoke-free work environment. With the rise
in the number of children with asthma, there may be more cause for concern,
particularly if an asthma attack or other respiratory problems are triggered
because a child is exposed to tobacco smoke in a school setting.
Support for Reason #10:
"Smoking material" fires are the leading cause of fire deaths in the U.S.
"Smoking materials" are lighted tobacco products, not lighters or matches.
According to the National Fire Protection Association, almost 4,000 deaths were
caused by fires in 2004. Lighted cigarettes can be easily tossed into school
trash cans, especially in bathrooms, placing schools and school children at
increased risk of injury due to "smoking material" fires. For more information,
visit www.nfpa.org
Source: Material listed here was adapted from both the NC Tobacco Prevention and Control Branch
and the Grass Roots Guide for Tobacco-Free
Schools in North Carolina. For additional sources, see links to materials
above.